
In a bold move to bolster immigration enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security is seeking assistance from an unexpected ally: the Internal Revenue Service.
At a Glance
- DHS requests IRS criminal investigators to help trace undocumented migrants through financial documents
- Trump administration plans large-scale deportation operation, potentially using Guantanamo Bay
- Sanctuary cities targeted as initial focus for deportation efforts
- Estimated cost of deporting all 11 million undocumented immigrants is $315 billion
- Mexico prepares for influx of deportees by building shelters and erecting tents in border towns
IRS Agents Join Immigration Enforcement Efforts
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is taking unprecedented steps to fulfill President Trump’s promise of a large-scale deportation operation. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has requested assistance from IRS criminal investigators to help trace illegal aliens through financial documents. This collaboration marks a significant shift in immigration enforcement strategy, merging tax and immigration matters for operational efficiency.
The involvement of IRS agents in immigration enforcement raises questions about the extent of interagency cooperation and the potential implications for civil liberties. Critics argue that this approach may blur the lines between tax compliance and immigration status, potentially affecting law-abiding immigrants and citizens alike.
Homeland Security Secretary Noem has asked for IRS agents to help w/ immigration enforcement, highlighting how the Trump administration’s focus on border & immigration is shifting resources from other government functions
Confirming WSJ w/ @SloweyErin https://t.co/qVJP8VDwsb
— Ellen M. Gilmer (@ellengilmer) February 10, 2025
Guantanamo Bay: A New Front in Immigration Enforcement
In a controversial move, the Trump administration is considering using Guantanamo Bay to detain illegal aliens. Reports suggest that a “tent city” is being established at the facility, with plans to house up to 30,000 deported border-jumpers. This development has sparked debate about the ethics and legality of using a military detention center for civilian immigration purposes.
The Justice Department has also filed a lawsuit against Illinois and Chicago, claiming their immigration policies interfere with federal efforts. This legal action underscores the ongoing tension between federal and local authorities regarding immigration enforcement.
Exclusive: Homeland Security has asked the Treasury secretary to deputize IRS criminal investigators to assist in immigration enforcement https://t.co/YdIEbMHBGk
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) February 10, 2025
Sanctuary Cities in the Crosshairs
Deportation flights began on January 23, with sanctuary cities like Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles as initial targets. The Trump administration’s focus on these cities has led to a range of responses from local leaders. Some have softened their rhetoric, while others vow to protect “migrants” within their jurisdictions.
The Laken Riley Act, recently passed, subjects more people to immediate deportations for minor crimes. This legislation, combined with empowering ICE to make arrests in previously protected venues like schools and churches, has significantly expanded the scope of immigration enforcement.
Challenges and International Implications
The administration faces significant challenges in implementing its deportation plans. Budget shortfalls and the need for congressional approval for additional funding pose substantial obstacles. The estimated cost of deporting all 11 million undocumented immigrants is a staggering $315 billion, raising questions about the feasibility and economic impact of such a massive operation.
Internationally, the deportation plans are causing ripple effects. Mexico is preparing for a potential influx of deportees by building shelters and erecting tents in border towns. Meanwhile, El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele has proposed jailing deportees, including American convicts, in exchange for a fee, highlighting the complex diplomatic challenges surrounding mass deportations.