House Prepares Contempt Charges Against Clintons

Bill and Hillary Clinton have brazenly defied a congressional subpoena, declaring themselves above the law that has already sent Trump associates to prison for the same crime.

Story Highlights

  • Clintons refused bipartisan House Oversight Committee subpoena regarding Epstein investigation
  • Constitutional scholar warns they have no viable legal defense against contempt charges
  • Same defiance strategy led to criminal convictions for Trump associates Bannon and Navarro
  • Committee preparing contempt proceedings that could result in criminal prosecution

Bipartisan Subpoena Defiance Sparks Constitutional Crisis

The House Oversight Committee issued subpoenas to Bill and Hillary Clinton on an unusual bipartisan basis to testify regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Chairman James Comer secured support from Democratic members, including Rep. Ro Khanna, who stated the Clintons must comply with lawful congressional demands. Instead of appearing, the Clintons issued a defiant letter declaring they would decide when to cooperate with Congress, writing that “now is that time” to fight regardless of consequences.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jonathan-turley-clintons-dare-house-hold-them-criminal-contempt-work

Constitutional law scholar Jonathan Turley, who has testified before Congress over 50 times, argues the Clintons have positioned themselves for criminal contempt proceedings with no cognizable legal defense. Unlike sitting members of Congress who can challenge committee legitimacy, the Clintons as private citizens face a permanent House committee with expansive, settled subpoena power. Their strategy mirrors that of Steven Bannon and Peter Navarro, both convicted of contempt of Congress for identical defiance.

Democratic Hypocrisy Exposed on Subpoena Enforcement

The Clintons’ defiance highlights stunning Democratic hypocrisy regarding congressional authority. Hillary Clinton previously mocked Bannon’s indictment, planning a “restful” weekend as he faced conviction for the same conduct she now embraces. President Biden declared during the January 6 investigation that defying subpoenas cannot be tolerated, demanding Congress “hold them accountable criminally.” Democratic rhetoric has shifted dramatically when their own allies face accountability.

Rep. Dan Goldman and other Democrats now view subpoena defiance as “righteous and somehow excusable” when protecting the Clintons. This represents a complete departure from institutional positions Democrats held when Trump associates defied congressional demands. The bipartisan nature of this subpoena eliminates typical partisan defenses, yet Democratic leadership prioritizes political loyalty over constitutional principles and equal application of law.

No Legal Defense Against Clear Contempt Violation

Turley emphasizes the Clintons have “left themselves no viable legal defense” by adopting Bannon’s failed strategy. Even invoking Fifth Amendment protections after appearing would be legally preferable to complete non-appearance, which constitutes clear contempt. The Clintons face a permanent House committee with established authority, unlike challenges to select committees that succeeded in other cases involving Republican members.

The House Oversight Committee is likely to proceed with contempt proceedings, potentially resulting in criminal referrals that would mirror prosecutions under the Biden administration. This case will establish whether congressional subpoena power applies uniformly or whether prominent political figures enjoy de facto immunity from laws binding ordinary citizens. The precedent affects constitutional separation of powers and congressional investigative authority for future oversight efforts.

Sources:

“Now is That Time”: Clintons Defy Congressional Subpoena and Trigger Contempt Proceedings

Clintons dare House to hold them in criminal contempt. It could work